Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 68
Filter
1.
Cytotherapy ; 25(6 Supplement):S239, 2023.
Article in English | EMBASE | ID: covidwho-20239698

ABSTRACT

Background & Aim: Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) revolutionized solid tumor treatment, however, in many tumors only partial response is achieved. Allocetra-OTS has an immune modulating effect on macrophages and dendritic cells and showed an excellent safety profile in patients including patients with sepsis and Covid-19. Here we investigated the anti-tumoral effect of Allocetra-OTS cellular therapy, in peritoneal solid tumor animal models. Methods, Results & Conclusion(s): Allocetra-OTS is manufactured from enriched mononuclear fractions and induced to undergo early apoptosis. Balb/c mice were inoculated intraperitoneally (IP) with AB12 (mesothelioma) with pLenti-PGK-V5-Luc-Neo and treated with anti- CTLA4 with or without Allocetra-OTS. Mice were monitored daily for clinical score and weekly using IVIS (Fig.1). Kaplan-Meier log rank test was done for survival. For Allocetra-OTS preparation, enriched mononuclear fractions were collected by leukapheresis from healthy eligible human donors and induced to undergo early apoptosis. Anti- CTLA4 standalone therapy significantly improved survival (Fig.2) from mean 34+/-9 to 44.9 +/-20 days. However, OTS standalone therapy was non-inferior and improved survival to 52.3 +/-20 days. Anti-CTLA4 + Allocetra-OTS combination therapy, ameliorated survival to 86.7+/-20 days with complete cancer remission in 60-100% of mice. Similar anti- tumoral effects of Allocetra-OTS were seen in mesothelioma model in a combination therapy with either anti-PD1 or cisplatin and using anti-PD1 in ID8 ovary cancer model. Based on single cell analysis confirmed by flow cytometry and pathology, the mechanism of action seems to be related or at least associated with an increase in f/480high peritoneal macrophages and a decrease in recruited macrophages, and to f/480high infiltration of the tumor. However, further studies are needed to confirm these observations. During IP tumor progression, Allocetra-OTS as a standalone therapy or in combination with ICI, or cisplatin, significantly reduced tumor size and resulted in complete remission in up to 100% treated mice. Similar results were obtained in ID8 ovary cancer. Based on excellent safety profile in > 50 patients treated in prior clinical trials for sepsis and Covid-19, Phase I/II clinical trial of Allocetra-OTS plus chemotherapy has started and three patient already recruited. A second phase I/II clinical trial of Allocetra- OTS plus anti-PD1, as a second- and third-line therapy in various cancers, was initiated in Q1 2023. [Figure presented]Copyright © 2023 International Society for Cell & Gene Therapy

2.
Cancer Research Conference: American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting, ACCR ; 83(7 Supplement), 2023.
Article in English | EMBASE | ID: covidwho-20237062

ABSTRACT

Project objective: Despite the recent revolution in immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs), only modest improvement in overall survival and likely caused by not enough potent cellular immunity among BC patients. Our lab has been focus on inducing cellular immunity against HER2+ BC through vaccination against the tumor-associated antigen HER2. Approximately 20 years ago, we performed an experimental pilot study by administrating HER2 peptide and recombinant protein pulsed dendritic cells (DC vaccine) to six patients with refractory HER2+ advanced or metastatic (stage II (>= 6 +LN), III, or stage IV) BC. We followed the patients on 2019 found that all of the six patients were still alive, 18 years after vaccination. Their blood sample were analyzed with cytometry by time-offlight (CyTOF) and found there is a significantly increased presence of CD27 expressing memory T cells in response to HER2 peptide stimulation. Recent report on the SARS-CoV2 mRNA vaccine also suggested that CD27 expressing memory T cells plays a critical role in long-lasting cellular immunity against SARS-CoV2 infection. Therefore, we hypothesized that CD27 plays a critical role in cellular immunity against BC, and the stimulation of CD27 expressing T cells with mAb targeting CD27 significantly increase the cellular immunity triggered by vaccination against tumor-associated antigen. Result(s): We recapitulate the rise of CD27+ antigen specific T cells among the vaccinated patients using a transgenic mouse model expressing human CD27. When combined the adenoviral-vector based HER2 (Ad-HER2) vaccination with a single dose of human aCD27 antibody (Varlilumab), we found there is a robust increase in the HER2 specific T cells compared to vaccination alone, especially CD27+CD44+ memory CD4 T cells, even after 120 days post vaccination. Using an ICIinsensitive syngeneic HER2+ BC models, we found 50% of mice in the combination group of aCD27 antibody plus Ad-HER2 showed total tumor regression by the end of study. When combined with anti-PD1 antibody, the combination of AdHER2 and Varlilumab leads to total tumor regression in 90% of tumor bearing mice with syngeneic HER2+ BC, indicating that the vaccination against tumor associated antigen HER2 plus anti-CD27 antibody sensitized ICI-insensitive HER2+ BC toward ICI. Conclusion(s): Our data demonstrates that the administration of anti-CD27 antibody significantly increase the long term presence of CD27+ antigen specific memory T cells after vaccination against tumor associated antigen HER2. As consequence, combination of anti-CD27 with HER2 sensitized the immune unresponsive breast cancer toward anti-PD1 antibody. Our study suggests that the vaccination against tumor-associated antigen with mAb targeting CD27 leads to the robust cellular immunity, which is required for successful ICIs against breast cancer.

3.
Cancer Research Conference: American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting, ACCR ; 83(7 Supplement), 2023.
Article in English | EMBASE | ID: covidwho-20236023

ABSTRACT

Background: The interaction between checkpoint inhibitors (CPI) and Sars-COV-2 vaccines has been understudied. One potential complication in pts receiving CPI is immune-mediated adverse events (irAEs) resulting from overactivation of the immune system. It is unknown whether concurrent CPI and Sars-COV-2 vaccine administration increases the risk of irAEs. This retrospective study examined the incidence of severe irAEs in cancer patients receiving CPI therapy at the time of vaccination against Sars CoV-2. Method(s): Following IRB approval, pts with solid tumors who received any approved CPI since FDA authorization of the COVID-19 vaccine in December 2020 were identified via institutional electronic health record. Pts who received one or more doses of an authorized vaccine within 60 days of CPI treatment were included. The primary endpoint was to evaluate the incidence of severe irAE (one or more of the following: grade 3 AE or above, multi-system involvement, need for hospitalization). Secondary endpoints included time between CPI and vaccination, need for immunosuppressive therapy, and rate of discontinuation of CPI due to irAE. Data was analyzed using descriptive statistics. Result(s): 290 pts with bladder, head/neck, liver, skin (melanoma, SCC), renal, and gynecologic cancer were included in analysis. The median age was 67 years (IQR: 59.0-74.0) and 66% pts were male. At the time of vaccination, 201 pts (69.3%) received CPI monotherapy, 53 pts (18.3%) received combination (combo) CPI therapy, and 36 pts (12.4%) received other therapies (chemo, TKIs, etc.) with CPI. The vaccine manufacturer was Pfizer Bio-N-Tech in 162 pts (55.9%), Moderna in 122 pts (42.1%), and Johnson and Johnson in 6 pts (2.1%). The number of vaccinations received was >/= 3 in 214 pts, 2 in 64 pts, and 1 in 11 pts. 30 pts (11.5%) experienced severe irAEs following vaccination. The rate of severe irAEs was 10.3% (30/290) in the total population [6% (12/201) with CPI monotherapy, 19% (10/53) with combo CPI, and 22% (8/36) in the combo CPI-other group]. Severe irAEs occurred after the first vaccine dose in 5 pts (16.7%), second dose in 16 pts (53.3%), and third dose in 9 pts (30%) pts. The median time between CPI treatment and vaccination in pts who experienced irAE was15.5 days (IQR: 10.2-23.0). Hospitalization was required for 19 patients (63.3%). 24 pts (80.0%) required immunosuppressive therapy with a median therapy duration of 98.5 days (IQR 40.2-173.0). 16 pts (53.5%) discontinued CPI therapy following severe irAEs Conclusion(s): In this retrospective study, we observed a 10.3% rate of severe irAE in cancer pts receiving CPI concurrently with COVID-19 vaccines. Further investigation in pts with additional cancer types is warranted to help determine best practice guidelines for COVID-19 vaccination in cancer patients receiving CPI.

4.
Prescriber ; 34(3):4, 2023.
Article in English | EMBASE | ID: covidwho-20232471
5.
Expert Rev Cardiovasc Ther ; 21(6): 437-451, 2023 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-20239452

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: Autoimmune myocarditis may develop due to heterogeneous causes. Myocarditis is often caused by viral infections, but it can also be caused by systemic autoimmune diseases. Immune checkpoint inhibitors and virus vaccines induce immune activation, and they can cause the development of myocarditis, as well as several immune-related adverse events. The development of myocarditis is dependent on the genetic factors of the host, and the major histocompatibility complex (MHC) may be an important determinant of the type and severity of the disease. However, non-MHC immunoregulatory genes may also play a role in determining susceptibility. AREA COVERED: This review summarizes the current knowledge of the etiology, pathogenesis, diagnosis, and treatment of autoimmune myocarditis with a particular focus on viral infection, autoimmunity, and biomarkers of myocarditis. EXPERT OPINION: An endomyocardial biopsy may not be the gold standard for the diagnosis of myocarditis. Cardiac magnetic resonance imaging is useful in diagnosing autoimmune myocarditis. Recently identified biomarkers of inflammation and myocyte injury are promising for the diagnosis of myocarditis when measured simultaneously. Future treatments should focus on the appropriate diagnosis of the etiologic agent, as well as on the specific stage of the evolution of immune and inflammatory processes.


Subject(s)
Myocarditis , Humans , Myocarditis/diagnosis , Myocarditis/etiology , Myocarditis/therapy , Autoimmunity , Inflammation , Biopsy , Biomarkers
6.
Int J Gen Med ; 16: 2187-2210, 2023.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-20233831

ABSTRACT

We aim to overview Addison's disease (AD) with regard to current diagnosis and management. This is a narrative review of full-length articles published in English between January 2022 and December 2022 (including online ahead of print versions) in PubMed-indexed journals. We included original studies in living humans regardless of the level of statistical significance starting from the key search terms "Addison's disease" or "primary adrenal insufficiency" in title or abstract. We excluded articles with secondary adrenal insufficiency. Briefly, 199 and 355 papers, respectively were identified; we manually checked each of them, excluded the duplicates, and then selected 129 based on their clinical relevance in order to address our 1-year analysis. We organized the data in different subsections covering all published aspects on the subject of AD. To our knowledge, this is the largest AD retrospective from 2022 on published data. A massive role of genetic diagnosis especially in pediatric cases is highlighted; the importance of both pediatric and adult awareness remains since unusual presentations continue to be described. COVID-19 infection is a strong player amid this third year of pandemic although we still not do have large cohorts in this particular matter as seen, for instance, in thyroid anomalies. In our opinion, the most important topic for research is immune checkpoint inhibitors, which cause a large panel of endocrine side effects, AD being one of them.

7.
Hepatology International ; 17(Supplement 1):S25, 2023.
Article in English | EMBASE | ID: covidwho-2326276

ABSTRACT

Ablation includes ethanol injection, radiofrequency ablation (RFA), microwave ablation (MWA), etc. Ablation can be potentially curative, minimally invasive and easily repeatable for recurrence. RFA has been the most widely used ablation technique for liver tumors. The new-generation MWA system incorporating antenna cooling and high-power generation has attracted attention. It can create a more predictable ablation zone and a larger ablation volume in a shorter procedure time. Many high-volume centers have introduced new-generation MWA in Japan. However, many studies failed to show that new-generation MWA is superior to RFA in terms of local control and overall survival. In MWA, clinical data have been insufficient compared with those of RFA. There has been keen competition between surgical resection and ablation for almost 40 years since the era of ethanol injection. In 2021, SURF trial revealed that overall survival and recurrence-free survival were not significantly different between surgical resection and RFA. SURF trial was a multicenter randomized controlled trial in which 49 major centers in Japan enrolled patients with good hepatic function (Child-Pugh scores <= 7) and primary HCC of largest diameter <= 3 cm, and <= 3 nodules during the 6-year period of 2009-2015. The registered patients were followed for at least 5 years. As the result of SURF trial and other comparative studies, the revised Japanese clinical practice guidelines in 2021 treats hepatic resection and ablation equally for patients with <= 3 lesions, <= 3 cm in diameter. Recently, the combination of systemic and locoregional therapies has been attracting much attention. Systemic therapy using molecular targeted agents or immune checkpoint inhibitors is used for advanced HCC which cannot be treated by surgery or ablation. On the other hand, some locoregional therapies, such as hepatectomy and ablation, are potentially curative, but they cannot be indicated for advanced HCC. Combination of both therapies is an approach to improve the prognosis of advanced HCC, which is not indicated for curative treatment. Systemic therapy is used to shrink the tumor, and then locoregional therapies are performed to eradicate it. The combination may build a new strategy for advanced HCC. Ablation is highly operator-dependent. The skills and outcomes are very different from operator to operator. Before the pandemic of COVID-19, we held domestic and international training programs for intermediate and advanced doctors and hands-on seminars for young doctors. These were activities to exchange knowledge and experience and standardize the procedure. During the pandemic, we cannot get together. Since August 2020, we have conducted Japan Ablation Webinar 8 times with a total of 1,566 participants. We have also conducted International Ablation Webinar 4 times with a total of 1,272 participated doctors. Education is important to acquire skills and knowledge for successful ablation. We have established Japan Academy of Tumor Ablation (JATA) this year. There are two triggers. One is that SURF trial revealed that there is no difference between hepatectomy and ablation. The other is that ablation for lung, bone and soft tissue and kidney cancers has become reimbursed with health insurance since this September.

8.
American Journal of Gastroenterology ; 117(10 Supplement 2):S1913-S1914, 2022.
Article in English | EMBASE | ID: covidwho-2326077

ABSTRACT

Introduction: Hepatic veno-occlusive disease (VOD) or sinusoidal obstruction syndrome (SOS), is a clinical syndrome characterized by hepatomegaly, right-upper quadrant pain, and ascites that occurs most commonly in the setting of high-dose chemotherapy or hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT). The diagnosis can be confirmed on biopsy. Cemiplimab is an immune checkpoint inhibitor recently approved for the treatment of cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma. There are currently no known reports of immune checkpoint inhibitor-related VOD/SOS. Case Description/Methods: A 58-year-old female with a history of locally advanced basal cell carcinoma of the left eye treated with six months of Cemipilimab presented with ascites. On admission, labs were notable for a total bilirubin of 1.2, mildly elevated liver function tests, alkaline phosphatase 884, and international normalized ratio 2.1. A diagnostic tap revealed a high SAAG ascites that was negative for infection. A comprehensive serological workup for viral, metabolic and autoimmune causes was unrevealing. A transjugular liver biopsy demonstrated a hepatic venous pressure gradient of 18mmHg, nodular regenerative hyperplasia (NRH), and portal venopathy. The patient was discharged on steroids but returned one month later for recurrent ascites and worsening bilirubin to 12.6 (direct 7.3);COVID PCR was negative. A full rheumatologic and vasculitis workup was unremarkable. Repeat biopsy (Figure 1) demonstrated moderate NRH changes, prominent central vein sclerosis with fibrous obliteration, signs of SOS/ VOD and central venulitis with fibrotic changes with sinusoidal portal hypertension. Discussion(s): VOD occurs most often with hematopoietic stem cell transplantation, and chemotherapeutic agents. Here we present the first case of checkpoint inhibitor-induced VOD/SOS. Despite discontinuation of the offending agent and a trial of steroids, the patient's clinical course continued to deteriorate. She eventually developed refractory ascites and portosystemic encephalopathy. She was deemed not a candidate for liver transplant given her underlying malignancy. She was transitioned to home hospice before further treatment, such as Defibrotide could have been pursued. VOD associated with immune checkpoint inhibition should be considered in the differential of patients who develop new onset liver dysfunction and ascites while receiving these medications (Figure Presented).

9.
European Respiratory Journal ; 60(Supplement 66):2560, 2022.
Article in English | EMBASE | ID: covidwho-2306656

ABSTRACT

Background: While immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) -induced myocarditis and coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) vaccine-induced myocarditis are considered to be rare;they are both significant side effects, suggested being caused by activation of the immune system against the myocardium. We aimed to assess whether both phenomena share similar presenting characteristics. Method(s): We included patients diagnosed with either ICI or COVID-19 vaccine-induced myocarditis at our medical center. We performed a retrospective assessment of clinical presentation, blood tests, and advanced echocardiography, including speckle strain. Result(s):We included 18 patients diagnosed with ICI (ICI group) or COVID- 19 vaccine (COVID-19 group)-induced myocarditis, and 20 patients with viral myocarditis (Viral group) as a control group. The median age was significantly older in the ICI group (74 years) compared to the COVID-19 and Viral groups (20 and 24 years), p<0.001. The clinical presentation in the COVID-19 group was more similar to the Viral group, presenting mainly with chest pain and fever, while the ICI group presented mainly with dyspnea. ST-elevation was frequent in the COVID-19 and Viral groups and absent in the ICI group, p=0.004. Median peak high sensitivity troponin I values were markedly lower in the ICI group compared to the COVID-19 and Viral groups (619 ng/L vs. 15527 ng/L vs. 7388 ng/L, p=0.004). While the median left ventricular ejection fraction was 60% among all groups, patients in the ICI group presented with mean lower LV global longitudinal strain (-13%) and left atrial conduit strain (17%), compared to the COVID-19 (-17% and 30%) and Viral groups (-18% and 37%), p=0.016 and p=0.001. Conclusion(s): While the suspected mechanism is an activation of the immune system in both ICI and the COVID-19 vaccine-induced myocarditis, we found that the clinical presentation, cardiac biomarkers, and advanced echocardiography of the COVID-19 vaccine, are more similar to viral myocarditis than to ICI-induced myocarditis.

10.
Japanese Journal of Lung Cancer ; 63(1):27-32, 2023.
Article in Japanese | Scopus | ID: covidwho-2306083

ABSTRACT

Background. Many patients have contracted coronavirus infectious disease, emerged in 2019 (COVID-19) during lung cancer treatment. However, few reports of COVID-19 infection occurring during chemoimmunotherapy have been published. Case. The patient was a 50-year-old man with advanced small cell lung cancer who was undergoing chemoimmunotherapy. He presented with fever, anorexia, and contracted COVID-19, which led to pneumonia. Patients with lung cancer may be at increased risk for COVID-19 infection, which could worsen their prognosis. However, the patient's COVID-19 pneumonia improved with dexamethasone, and he was able to resume lung cancer treatment. Conclusion. Chemoimmunotherapy may lead to the development of severe disease in patients with COVID-19. COVID-19 pneumonia is often difficult to differentiate from lung injury caused by immune-related adverse events associated with chemoimmunotherapy. Upon the development of pneumonia, we should always suspect COVID-19, diagnose it early, and treat it appropriately. Furthermore, we need to carefully consider the resumption of lung cancer treatment after COVID-19, depending on the severity of residual fibrosis. © 2023 The Japan Lung Cancer Society.

11.
Front Immunol ; 14: 1174184, 2023.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2290751

ABSTRACT

The corona virus disease 2019 (COVID-19) global pandemic has had an unprecedented and persistent impact on oncological practice, especially for patients with lung cancer, who are more vulnerable to the virus than the normal population. Indeed, the onset, progression, and prognosis of the two diseases may in some cases influence each other, and inflammation is an important link between them. The original chronic inflammatory environment of lung cancer patients may increase the risk of infection with COVID-19 and exacerbate secondary damage. Meanwhile, the acute inflammation caused by COVID-19 may induce tumour progression or cause immune activation. In this article, from the perspective of the immune microenvironment, the pathophysiological changes in the lungs and whole body of these special patients will be summarised and analysed to explore the possible immunological storm, immunosuppression, and immune escape phenomenon caused by chronic inflammation complicated by acute inflammation. The effects of COVID-19 on immune cells, inflammatory factors, chemokines, and related target proteins in the immune microenvironment of tumours are also discussed, as well as the potential role of the COVID-19 vaccine and immune checkpoint inhibitors in this setting. Finally, we provide recommendations for the treatment of lung cancer combined with COVID-19 in this special group.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Lung Neoplasms , Humans , COVID-19 Vaccines , SARS-CoV-2 , Inflammation , Immunity , Tumor Microenvironment
12.
Prescriber ; 34(3):5-8, 2023.
Article in English | EMBASE | ID: covidwho-2261259

ABSTRACT

Ongoing research into the use of messenger RNA (mRNA) vaccines for the treatment of cancer has been expediated by the coronavirus pandemic because similar technology was used in the development of mRNA COVID-19 vaccines. So how close are we now to the widespread clinical use of mRNA anti-cancer vaccines?.Copyright © 2023 Wiley Interface Ltd.

13.
Journal of Clinical Oncology ; 41(6 Supplement):491, 2023.
Article in English | EMBASE | ID: covidwho-2260643

ABSTRACT

Background: COVID-19 vaccination recommendations for cancer patients (pts) are similar to the general population. The interaction between checkpoint inhibitors (CPI) and Sars-COV-2 vaccines has been understudied. One potential complication in pts receiving CPI is the occurrence of immune-mediated adverse events (irAEs) resulting from overactivation of the immune system. This retrospective study examined the incidence of severe irAEs in pts with bladder urothelial cancer (UC) treated with CPI therapy who received concurrent vaccinations against Sars-CoV-2. Method(s): Following IRB approval, UC pts who received any approved CPI treatment since FDA authorization of the first COVID-19 vaccine in December 2020 were identified via institutional electronic health record. Pts who received 1 or more doses of an authorized vaccine within 60 days of CPI treatment were included. The primary endpoint was to evaluate the incidence of severe irAE (defined as one or more of the following: grade 3 AE or above, multi-system involvement, need for hospitalization). Secondary endpoints included time between CPI and vaccination, need for immunosuppressive therapy, and rate of discontinuation. Data was analyzed using descriptive statistics. Result(s): Forty pts were included in our analysis with a median age of 72.5 years (IQR: 66.0-79.2);82% pts were male. At the time of vaccination, 37 pts (92.5%) received CPI monotherapy, 2 pts (5.0%) received combination (combo) CPI therapy, and 1 pt (2.5%) received combo platinum-based chemotherapy and CPI. The vaccine manufacturer was Pfizer Bio-NTech in 22 pts (55.0%), Moderna in 17 pts (42.5%), and Johnson and Johnson in 1 pt (2.5%). Number of vaccinations received was>/= 3 in 27 pts, 2 in 11 pts, and 1 in 2 pts. Six pts (15.0%) experienced severe irAEs following vaccination, including nephritis, colitis, pneumonitis, DKA, and infusion-related reaction. Rates of severe irAEs were 16.2% (6/37) with CPI monotherapy, no severe irAEs occurred in the combo CPI and combo CPI-chemo groups. Severe irAEs occurred after the first vaccine dose in 1 pt (16.7%), second dose in 3 pts (50.0%), and third dose in 2 pts (33.3%) pts. The median time between CPI treatment and vaccination in this group was 22.0 days (IQR: 15.8-36.5. Hospitalization was required for all 6 patients (100%). Three pts (50.0%) required immunosuppressive therapy with a median therapy duration of 64.0 days (IQR 47.0-83.5). Five pts (83.3%) discontinued CPI therapy following severe irAEs. Conclusion(s): In this retrospective study, we observed a 15% rate severe irAE in UC pts receiving CPI concurrently with COVID-19 vaccines. Further investigation in pts with additional cancer types is warranted to help determine best practice guidelines for COVID-19 vaccination in cancer patients receiving CPI.

14.
Journal of Onco-Nephrology ; 7(1):15-21, 2023.
Article in English | EMBASE | ID: covidwho-2250961

ABSTRACT

Background: Immune check point inhibitors (ICPi) have become the first line treatment for most of the cancers and have shown promising results. However, they can provoke reactions, the most feared being immune related adverse events (irAE). Case presentation: We present a series of three cases, of patients recieving ICPi. All three patients developed AKI after administration of SARS-CoV-2 mRNA vaccine. Two patients had kidney-biopsy-proven acute interstitial nephritis (AIN) which responded to ICPi discontinuation and treatment with steroids. One had presumed AIN based on the high levels of CRP and urine retinol binding protein to creatinine ratio and responded to cessation of ICPi alone. Conclusion(s): These three cases demonstrate that a strong immune response from the SARS-CoV-2 mRNA vaccine combined with an uninhibited immune system under influence of ICPi led to an amplification of autoimmunity leading to AKI presenting as AIN.Copyright © The Author(s) 2022.

15.
Japanese Journal of Lung Cancer ; 63(1):27-32, 2023.
Article in Japanese | EMBASE | ID: covidwho-2287653

ABSTRACT

Background. Many patients have contracted coronavirus infectious disease, emerged in 2019 (COVID-19) during lung cancer treatment. However, few reports of COVID-19 infection occurring during chemoimmunotherapy have been published. Case. The patient was a 50-year-old man with advanced small cell lung cancer who was undergoing chemoimmunotherapy. He presented with fever, anorexia, and contracted COVID-19, which led to pneumonia. Patients with lung cancer may be at increased risk for COVID-19 infection, which could worsen their prognosis. However, the patient's COVID-19 pneumonia improved with dexamethasone, and he was able to resume lung cancer treatment. Conclusion. Chemoimmunotherapy may lead to the development of severe disease in patients with COVID-19. COVID-19 pneumonia is often difficult to differentiate from lung injury caused by immune-related adverse events associated with chemoimmunotherapy. Upon the development of pneumonia, we should always suspect COVID-19, diagnose it early, and treat it appropriately. Furthermore, we need to carefully consider the resumption of lung cancer treatment after COVID-19, depending on the severity of residual fibrosis.Copyright © 2023 The Japan Lung Cancer Society.

16.
European Respiratory Journal Conference: European Respiratory Society International Congress, ERS ; 60(Supplement 66), 2022.
Article in English | EMBASE | ID: covidwho-2285473

ABSTRACT

Background: COVID-19 pandemic has led physicians to change their practice in the treatment of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) to reduce hospital stays of patients. Objective(s): We aimed to assess toxicity and efficacy of extended-interval (EI) dosing of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) compared to standard dose (SD). Method(s): In a retrospective bicentric study, patients with stage III/IV NSCLC treated with ICI +/- pemetrexed in maintenance setting during the month before March 2020 were included. Immune-related adverse events (IRAE) and efficacy were collected until June 2021. Toxicity and survival were assessed using multivariate logistic regression and Cox models. Result(s): Among the 134 identified patients (8 stage III and 126 stage IV, 66 in 1st line and 60 in 2nd or further lines), 70.9% had an EI dosing. In the EI dosing group, 12.6% patients developed grade 3 or more IRAE and 15.4% in the SD group (p=0.8). Treatment was definitively discontinued for toxicity for 9 patients in the EI dosing group and 5 patients in the SD group (p=0.5). Overall survival was not associated with dosage or occurrence of toxicity as timedependent variable (Table). Conclusion(s): Our study suggests that EI dosing of ICI did not affect toxicity, efficacy and survival in NSCLC patients.

17.
Coronaviruses ; 3(2):3-5, 2022.
Article in English | EMBASE | ID: covidwho-2277921
18.
Can Assoc Radiol J ; : 8465371221120263, 2022 Aug 13.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2275872

ABSTRACT

The Coronavirus Disease of 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has caused significant delays in the delivery of cancer treatments in Canada. As cancer treatment and imaging volumes return to normal, radiologists will encounter more cases of chemotherapy-induced toxicities. These toxicities have varied appearances on imaging, and can affect multiple organ systems. The purpose of this review is to offer a unified resource for general radiologists regarding the imaging appearances of chemotherapy-induced toxicities.

19.
Clin Neurol Neurosurg ; 226: 107632, 2023 03.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2245607

ABSTRACT

Vaccination is useful for the prevention of COVID-19 and is recommended for everyone, especially people with a weakened immune system. However, various neurological complications have been reported following vaccination. Here, we report the case of a 25 years-old, Japanese man, who presented with acute encephalopathy two days after the second dose of the COVID-19 vaccine. He had been treated with nivolumab, a medication used to treat cancer. He had a high fever and was confused upon admission, and the antibody test was positive for anti-myelin oligodendrocyte glycoproteins. Abnormal signal intensity at the splenium corporis callosi was observed on diffusion-weighted imaging of the brain. We diagnosed him with autoimmune encephalitis and initiated intravenous methylprednisolone, after which, the patient's symptoms rapidly subsided.


Subject(s)
Brain Diseases , COVID-19 , Male , Humans , Nivolumab , COVID-19 Vaccines , Vaccination
20.
Annu Rev Microbiol ; 76: 435-460, 2022 09 08.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2246760

ABSTRACT

Extensive research has elucidated the influence of the gut microbiota on human health and disease susceptibility and resistance. We review recent clinical and laboratory-based experimental studies associating the gut microbiota with certain human diseases. We also highlight ongoing translational advances that manipulate the gut microbiota to treat human diseases and discuss opportunities and challenges in translating microbiome research from and to the bedside.


Subject(s)
Disease , Gastrointestinal Microbiome , Therapeutics , Fecal Microbiota Transplantation , Humans , Probiotics/therapeutic use , Therapeutics/trends
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL